January 14, 2006

Measure Up

How do we know what we know? By what criteria of measurement can we validate what we are told, with what is real? Does the discontinuity of the official line have any significant ramifications in how we choose to live life? Sink or swim, publish or perish, go along to get along? It's all up to what you value spoke the great harrison in a drug induced dimentia called thirtythree and a third, why did they stop timothy leary theory?
What i value is peace, cooperative competition on a level rules based playing field where creativity and hard work is rewarded rather than harnessed. Galt's gulch. The America of the revolution, not the Amerikan one party system of today. As i watch with baited breath, i continue to invest my time in networks, building thought from various diverse POVs into a rational common direction - which cannot be done with the corruption of the information at hand. The entire body of knowledge ought to be remeasured from scratch with the data validated by repetition rather than by control. Current QA/QC methodology rejects outlying information - but probability requires that sometimes the results are minority occurence from the bulk of information. These are still valid results, not to be ignored.
Things change, while things never change. It's all a matter of time, relative time. But time is frequency dependent, in fact, time is defined in terms of cesium emissions. Atomic clocks. With age, we learn to control our time, to waste it as we wish on productive or counter productive tasks, again depending on POV. Given the time and space of today - i plan to have one heck of a ride on the rollar coaster of life. Glad you can join me in the quest for proper knowledge, truth for its own sake.

No comments: