Whoever dies with the most toys still dies, and keeping that person alive is not the name of the game. The economic form expressed through pure barter seems better than one where price is set by middle players in a game where their connectivity is their profitability, not their work. Application of interest to a popular niche washes out the ability to score big. Work could be optional, but what is responsibility worth? How do people who have so little ability end up with high paying jobs where they get to boss other people around? Oh - they all work for government? or corporations? Maybe i'm just experiencing a jambed pipeline or something, but when it breaks it will immediately hit the fan. Cause you can't get something for nothing.
October 25, 2006
Something for Nothing?
Whoever dies with the most toys still dies, and keeping that person alive is not the name of the game. The economic form expressed through pure barter seems better than one where price is set by middle players in a game where their connectivity is their profitability, not their work. Application of interest to a popular niche washes out the ability to score big. Work could be optional, but what is responsibility worth? How do people who have so little ability end up with high paying jobs where they get to boss other people around? Oh - they all work for government? or corporations? Maybe i'm just experiencing a jambed pipeline or something, but when it breaks it will immediately hit the fan. Cause you can't get something for nothing.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment