How do we correct bad information? We all add up the pieces and draw our individual conclusions, then share the proceeds of our discovery with others. We learn by doing and by sifting through information that supports our conclusions. When the data turns out to be bad - do we reject the conclusions that were based on that data. If so, can we still draw the same conclusion using other data? Somehow - methinks we know quite a bit more than we really know.
So now stress dominates over half the month. The fiscal bells and whistles of the household started blustering their december tune the day after Thanksgiving and finally resolved themselves yesterday. No wonder nobody wishes to play the role of fiscal officer. People spend more time contemplating cents than the time is worth.
The household is a fractal of the greater society. I remember having similar stress dealing with the secretary of state as the treasurer of the reform party of oregon, as i have dealing with the landlord - those who 'own' the land lord of it with their own rules. Kinda feudal. So i become skeptical of everybody with any financial interests - is this any way to run a society? Banksters, guns and money. Egads.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
1 comment:
The run of the mill survival game is meant to do one thing, Stress you out and if it doesn't then it will those around you. Which low and behold eventually gets to you! We can run but we can not hide. We can Ramble and choose our personal forms of genocide or we can be come the face of absolute wonder and see where the solution hides. You say we know more than we really know, and from my POV that is true especially if we view the world from our soul.
May you find the answer the works for whole and offer it with words others will follow.
This is our new blog on the tech.
Blessings to your day.
http://technologyofpeace.blogspot.com/
Post a Comment