June 29, 2012

winning the twit race

   Sometimes, the light come on.  I was thinking about lattice energy and the random walk theory and all of a sudden the implication of the Ministry of Silly Walks struck me and Monty Python reared it's multi-head.  I always favored Eric Idle - John Cleese got the meatiest roles.  I'm a lumberjack and i'm okay. (assist to the arch-druid's comments on black nights)
   So, for the time being, i have a mission that requires me to gain and lose time coordinates.  The grand experiment will let me know about some of the theories that i believe hold water, so to speak.  Once you look at the size grid, you start to realize how ubiquitous water really is.  It is small, and thus present in great numbers.  But we can easily get lost in the numbers as we struggle to get the math.
   i am stuck upon renumeration.  How do we attain just compensation for effort, when the results are what really matter.  If you break things down, quantum reality eventually conscripts itself, but as you build things up, you find that there is true insanity in infinity.  The concept is as broken as any word has ever been.  If you say infinity, everybody conjures up a different image.
   really, it starts with the same symbol.  My editor here is not going to let me draw the infinity symbol, but we know the double loop well, an eight on its side.  If you twist that in the middle, then you can envision a path along the inside that is different from the path on the inside, but has the same contour and virtual dimension - the difference being the thickness of the line.
   the time being is restoring order from chaos by realigning the frequencies based on the spectrum of the prism.  the resonance plateau that we inhabit carries the symbol of adjacent places - the one we came from and the one that we are headed to -  imagine the distribution as a bell shaped curve.  If you are still with me - take your bell from two dimensions to three dimensions - and now ask what the bell shape would do when it captures a frequency - especially if is is a harmonic of the bell itself.
   so, the apparent question appears to be, why does hot water freeze quicker than colder water.  The answer is worth a thousand pounds to one of the british tabloids.  If you claim the prize with this solution, be nice and split it with me.  the answer is trans-positional lattice energy.  Water has a strange property in that it has it's smallest volume at 4 degrees C.  
   As the individual water atoms orient to each other, then comes a point where it requires a bump in energy to orient the freezing process.  Once this happens and the ice crystals start forming in all directions, once they have a point of nucleation and the crystal lattice forms.  Energy is released, which is then used by other water molecules to rotate to their most suitable alignment.  The slower this happens, the more perfect the crystal.
   so approaching from the hot direction, there is some energy that is given as motion and this provides enough oomph to create the points of nucleation and form the crystal, as opposed to the cold system; which can be looked upon as supersaturated until the change inducing event suddenly occurs. So the translation energy required for alignment of each water molecule with the next is a geometry problem that depends on the speed of approach, in temperature terms where speed is the measure of decrease or increase of temperature.
   of course, nobody thinks much on these terms any longer, but in truth - it pays to think differently than the main water carriers.  since sociology is a fractal of chemistry, we may be in the supersaturation phase ourselves, waiting for drake's tale to turn out long or short.  The ice freezes just the same, it is just a change in a rate - a function of time, thus the domain of the time being.  And she is a happy camper today.
   Namaste'   doc

No comments: