Things
are coming together as things are falling apart. The idea that people
share a common prospectus is a secular myth that appears difficult
for the common person to grok. When you lose touch with the things
you are supposed to be interested in, then you find yourself
stretched for conversation. When we politely exclude religion and
politics from affable discussion, we are left talking about TV shows
and gossip. Most people feel in their element – they can handle
conversation at this depth.
I
find it difficult to get most people any deeper than superficial.
Those friends that I keep contact with are either as depth defying as
I, or have a civic cause that they are dedicate to pursue. The
common thread is the development of community, but sometimes I know
that I am fooling myself … the common cause is self-preservation.
Each attempt at community has turned to failure because the pull of
the universal system requires focus on making money to pay one's way.
I
prefer the weigh, my interpretation of the Tao, the book of changes.
I misplaced my yellow copy, on a shelf with books, likely in NoCal
with a lot of my other stuff. I intend to return, but the whirled
changes quicker than one can imagine when not paying much attention
to detail. The better immersed in a specific focus, like mining, the
less time there is to worry about the mundane whirled of the muggles.
The I-Ching (Tao) is a compendium of eastern philosophy written by
Lao Tzu and edited for America by Americans. I found a paperback
using Legge's interpretation, three penny roles can replace the three
chinese coins that were broken during travel.
There
are other weighs of approaching the grid of sixty-four besides the
Tao. The chess board supplies a wealth of eight by eight thought in
a checkerboard pattern where white plays against black at a slight
opening advantage. Rather than limit the game to chess, I enjoy
using chess pieces to play other derivative games of chess. The
website Scheming Mind has a
handle on all these variants and for $25/year allows unlimited
access, one move at a time. Tell em lemme set ya.
The
game Lao Tzu chess is very much like the real life situation we find
ourselves in today. The chessboard is set up with the pawns on the
second row, but the pieces are scrambled behind them. The king is
centered somewhere between the two rooks. The game is a dark game,
you only get to see the parts of the board where your pieces can
move, which initially is your own side of the board, covered by the
pawns opening moves. If a piece is blocked, you do not get to see
the blocker, unless you can take it. As the game progresses, the
squares of the board wink in and out of darkness as the pieces
develop into their forward positions.
When
you take a piece, it gets removed from the board and placed into your
reserve pile. At any point of the game, instead of making a move on
the board, you can place a piece down onto the board. You may only
place it on a square that you can see. Pawns may not be placed on
the front or back row, but placing a pawn on the seventh and queening
it by advancing to the eighth row is a valid stratagem. You may
deliver a new piece with check, but often the game is a hunt for
finding the opponents king. I like to call the game Mushroom Chess,
because we are kept in the dark and shoveled lots of shit. The
material advantage can be lost in an instant, and giving up pieces
for location information is a pseudo-artform.
Another
different favorite is Benedict's chess. Here everything starts our
seemingly normal, until you attack an opponents piece. As with
Benedict Arnold during the Revolutionary War myth, the piece attacked
changes color and becomes your piece. Change the king, win the game.
I suppose that red and blue might be better colors than black and
white – white moving first has a large but not fatal advantage.
There is a lot of variance in the play of this variant – the game
can change appearance on every move.
To
play these games takes a bit of patience and good internet access.
The moves are made one at a time. You post a move and it starts your
opponents clock, and adds a period of time to your clock based on the
initial time of game – usually either 10 or 30 days. I check in
once or twice per day and generally have about 25 games going –
three or four waiting. If I have lots of 10 day games, the frequency
is higher. The site also features an old type of on-line bulletin
board and the ability to kibbitz in on other people's games. You can
make a game private to outside viewers, if you are not playing in a
tournament. There are public and private tourneys and generally you
can find a slot to play a game. The best weigh is to dive right in,
but find an opponent who is willing to give advice. Games are rated
and ratings are updated monthly.
Scheming
Mind is based out of Great Britain. The players come from all over
the globe – I have been on-line long enough that I have established
friends world-wide, even before instant messaging and skype were
prevalent. When I lose my net access, I stress because I lose chess
games. Thus, I have my own illusions within the Matrix and can focus
off the beaten path with plenty of distraction to avoid the MSM.
The
MSM is the main stream media : I prefer to call them the LSM as in
lame stream media. They are the bankster's folly; the game is to
provide all the information that you might need to know to keep you
distracted and under their spell. The education system prepares us
with common myths of history and economics, science and technology,
social studies and most of all entertainment. How we choose to
entertain ourselves is a very telling portion of the human condition.
The
current myths are running dry; we have been to the well too often.
We believed the game as it was developing – as a child of the
sixties, the television was my baby-sitter. I was five when Kennedy
was shot – they broke into the game show Concentration to have me
watch Lee Harvey Oswald get blown away by Jack Ruby. No wonder that
our society is inured to violent behavior – the box scatters bodies
left and right. When the X-boxes and game machines came out – the
simulations of death were a common theme. The shoot em up games were
way more popular than the investigation games – I remember the
Castle Wolfenstein and the hunt to erase the Nazi plague. When you
killed Hitler, a little Hitler popped out and ran – and the game
continued …
Used
to play games until I won, then I discovered that life was happening
when I was consumed by the game environment. As I was brought up by
TV, my boys were brought up by computer games. We played together
when Civilization came out – the history lessons took myth into a
differential myth and the character types became archetypes for
reading people. As life's pressures developed, I quit games and
began to focus on work – being pushed to earn a living while
maintaining a lifestyle with a connection to nature. Nature is not a
player in artificial reality.
I
became a vehicle for everybody else. By working hard with focus, I
allowed a saddle on my back – volunteer efforts to do the right
thing were often co-opted by the overall movement – we rise to the
level of our ability and then one step further – the Peter
Principle. It would be nice to take that last step back into the old
comfort zone: that illusion is never an option in a society that is
always progressing. That progress was the central myth to the
American religion is a concept develop by the Arch Druid in his
latest series of essays – the myths of today derive their basis
from this common learning grid that schools provide inadequately.
How to learn is an individually developed skill. We all know what
works best for us, and rarely is learning accomplished by being
lectured at.
I
learned to limit an essay's volume – more on this topic next thyme.
Namaste'
doc 051413
No comments:
Post a Comment